Theory
The acoustic impedance of a perforate is computed per hole (Acoustic impedance model of a perforated wall). The hole diameter enters every model:
- the viscous boundary layer in the hole scales with the radius (the Stokes number , equation (1));
- the inertia of the air in and around the hole grows with the end correction, a multiple of , equation (3);
- the Elnady model adds a resistive end correction that is a cubic in , equation (2), and its radiation resistance depends on .
In a CFD + acoustics case with a perforated tube (or a thick plate), the hole diameter is entered once on the flow part of the card (Hole diameter) and the acoustic field is hidden; both use the same stored value.
The diameter also selects the auto discharge coefficient (Discharge coefficient C_D (acoustics)) through the table.
Equations
| where | meaning | unit |
|---|---|---|
| Hole diameter | m | |
| Hole radius | m | |
| Angular frequency | rad/s | |
| Density and dynamic viscosity of the gas | kg/m³, Pa s | |
| Resistive end correction of the Elnady model | m | |
| End-correction factor | - | |
| Hole-interaction factor | - |
Default and rule
- Default
- 3.0 mm shown on a new wall (the case file stores none until the card is saved)
- Rule
The card shows 3.0 mm for a wall that has no hole diameter yet; the value is stored when the card is saved. There is no automatic estimate: enter the real diameter of the holes. The value is stored in m and shown in mm.
- Source
Resistive end correction and the other Elnady terms: (Elnady et al., 2010). Measured ranges of the models: (Lee and Ih, 2003), (Kirby and Cummings, 1998), (Sullivan and Crocker, 1978).
Valid range > 0; each impedance model has its own measured range (see Range)
Model ranges
Elnady's table was measured for d 0.6-2.4 mm (values up to 5 mm are extrapolated; beyond that the edge value is used); Lee & Ih 2-9 mm; Sullivan & Crocker measured one plate with d 2.49 mm.
Outside the range
The acoustic QA gate lists a diameter outside the selected model's range as a warning; the run continues.
Related 7
References 4
- Elnady, T., Åbom, M. and Allam, S. (2010). Modeling perforates in mufflers using two-ports. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 132(6), 061010. DOI 10.1115/1.4001510
- Kirby, R. and Cummings, A. (1998). The impedance of perforated plates subjected to grazing gas flow and backed by porous media. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 217(4), 619-636. DOI 10.1006/jsvi.1998.1811
- Lee, S.-H. and Ih, J.-G. (2003). Empirical model of the acoustic impedance of a circular orifice in grazing mean flow. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(1), 98-113. DOI 10.1121/1.1581280
- Sullivan, J. W. and Crocker, M. J. (1978). Analysis of concentric-tube resonators having unpartitioned cavities. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64(1), 207-215. DOI 10.1121/1.381963