SpectraSim Documentation
Parameter · 05 Boundary Conditions

Bias (through-hole) Mach number

perforate.bias_mach Step 05 · Boundary Conditions

The Mach number of the mean flow INSIDE the holes of the perforated wall. It drives the bias-flow resistance (Elnady model, the bias-flow option) and the through-flow resistance of the cross-flow model.

Last updated

Theory

The hole speed is the normal flow speed through the wall divided by the open-area ratio. On auto it is taken as follows.

Cross-flow model (always uses it):

  • the net through-flow of the CFD's perforate samples, divided by σA\sigma A (from the last loss-coefficient update of the flow run);
  • else the total inflow divided by σA\sigma A when the flow is on (perpendicular-baffle assumption: all of the flow crosses this wall);
  • else 0 (acoustics only: enter the number).

Other models, with [[perforate.bias_flow]] on:

  • the mapped CFD field: the area mean of ∣U⋅n∣|\mathbf U\cdot\mathbf n| over the wall, divided by σ\sigma (acoustic medium mapped from the CFD);
  • else the mean hole speed ∣Un∣/σ|U_n|/\sigma of the CFD's perforate samples;
  • else 0.

Without the bias-flow option (and for models other than cross-flow and Elnady's own term) the bias Mach number is 0. The cross-flow resistance is 2.57 Mb2.57\,M_b (Sullivan, 1979) (eq. 16, MbM_b = mean hole speed / c), the bias resistance 1.15 Mb/CD1.15\,M_b/C_D (Elnady et al., 2010).

Equations

Mb=1σc ∑e∣Ue⋅ne∣ Ae∑eAe  (mapped field),Mb=QσAc  (whole-flow estimate)M_b = \frac{1}{\sigma c}\,\frac{\sum_e |\mathbf{U}_e\cdot\mathbf{n}_e|\,A_e}{\sum_e A_e}\ \ \text{(mapped field)}, \qquad M_b = \frac{Q}{\sigma A c}\ \ \text{(whole-flow estimate)}
(1)
θcross=2.57 Mb,θbias=1.15 MbCD\theta_{cross} = 2.57\,M_b, \qquad \theta_{bias} = \frac{1.15\,M_b}{C_D}
(2)
wheremeaningunit
MbM_bBias Mach number in the holes-
σ\sigmaOpen-area ratio-
ccSpeed of sound of the local gasm/s
Ue,ne,Ae\mathbf{U}_e, \mathbf{n}_e, A_eMean velocity, unit normal, area of wall triangle em/s, -, m²
QQTotal inflow (or the net through-flow of the samples)m³/s
AAArea of the perforated wallm²
CDC_DDischarge coefficient-

Default and rule

Default
auto: from the CFD in a flow + acoustics run (cross-flow model: net through-flow / (σA), or Q / (σA)); 0 in an acoustics-only runComputed by the program
Rule

Auto. A typed number overrides every source.

Source

Validation on the two-baffle test muffler at 0.0556 kg/s against a reference transmission loss with flow: the cross-flow model with M 0.041-0.053 gave an rms deviation of 2.5 dB (with the earlier resistance 4×0.514 Mb4 \times 0.514\,M_b, 20 % lower than now; not repeated since); the Elnady model with grazing and bias flow (M_b 0.05-0.08) 3.0 dB. Bias resistance: (Elnady et al., 2010).

Valid range 0 ≤ M_b ≤ 0.6

Values

0 to 0.6.

Acoustics only

Without a flow solution the auto value is 0, which for the cross-flow model means the small no-flow resistance; enter the hole Mach number of the operating point.

References 2

  1. Elnady, T., Åbom, M. and Allam, S. (2010). Modeling perforates in mufflers using two-ports. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 132(6), 061010. DOI 10.1115/1.4001510
  2. Sullivan, J. W. (1979). A method for modeling perforated tube muffler components. II. Applications. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66(3), 779-788. DOI 10.1121/1.383680